How much could you claim?

Find out in 30 seconds...
Injured in the last 3 years?
Was the accident your fault?
Did you recieve medical attention?
Please tell us where you were injured
  • Please enter your full name
  • Please enter a valid name
  • Please enter your telephone number
  • Please enter a valid telephone number
  • Please read our Terms & Conditions

    "If you've been injured through no fault of your own you could be entitled to compensation. If you're unsure if you could claim, I recommend you call Accident Advice Helpline."

    Esther Rantzen

    Health and Safety News

    Worker’s shattered arm leads to prosecution for packaging firm

    By David Brown on May 12, 2015

    Worker’s shattered arm leads to prosecution for packaging firm

    A packaging company in Hertfordshire has been prosecuted under the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 after a worker experienced horrific arm injuries while working for them. Harry Bracewell, 20, suffered a serious break to his right arm when the mailing machine he was using pulled his arm in between the belt of the machine and a roller. The incident led him to suffer crush injuries and a shattered arm that required metal plates and screws to fix the injuries.

    This type of incident, where the offending machine was found to have been poorly guarded, is the type of situation in which Accident Advice Helpline may identify negligence on the part of the employer. We have certainly had this happen before in cases where people have come to us for no-obligation advice.

    Not guarded

    An investigation into the incident found that Ampac Security Products Ltd had not provided a guard for the machine Mr Bracewell had been using. He had been trained on a similar machine used elsewhere in the same factory, but training had not been provided for the machine he was using when the accident happened.

    Mr Bracewell was trying to clean a belt on the machine that was still moving. This was not safe, but it was the standard practice for the other similar machine. This was not safe either, but it was regularly done. The accident could well have been prevented if the proper risk assessment had been completed and the health and safety measures had been followed. Instead, he suffered a shattered arm and ended up having flashbacks of what happened. He still takes medication today in order to sleep properly.

    £10,000 fine

    The company was fined £10,000, with an additional £2,328 added on in costs by the court after pleading guilty to breaching the act. An inspector for the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) said afterwards that proper guards were essential on all machinery, regardless of the industry in question.

    Accident Advice Helpline have come across many cases such as this, where people have been injured through a lack of training or a lack of proper safety measures or procedures. If you think that you may have been injured in similar circumstances, contact us on 0800 689 0500 today to find out whether a no win no fee* compensation claim could be possible.

    Source: Health and Safety Executive

    Share On


    Date Published: May 12, 2015

    Author: David Brown

    Category: News

    Accident Advice Helpline (or AAH) is a trading style of Slater Gordon Solutions Legal Limited. Slater Gordon Solutions Legal Limited is a company registered in England and Wales with registration number 07931918, VAT 142 8192 16, registered office Dempster Building, Atlantic Way, Brunswick Business Park, Liverpool, L3 4UU and is an approved Alternative Business Structure authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

    Disclaimer: This website contains content contributed by third parties, therefore any opinions, comments or other information expressed on this site that do not relate to the business of AAHDL or its associated companies should be understood as neither being held or endorsed by this business.

    No-Win No-Fee: *Subject to insurance costs. Fee payable if case not pursued at client's request.