How much could you claim?

Find out in 30 seconds...
Injured in the last 3 years?
Was the accident your fault?
Did you recieve medical attention?
Please tell us where you were injured
  • Please enter your full name
  • Please enter a valid name
  • Please enter your telephone number
  • Please enter a valid telephone number
  • Please read our Terms & Conditions

    "If you've been injured through no fault of your own you could be entitled to compensation. If you're unsure if you could claim, I recommend you call Accident Advice Helpline."

    Esther Rantzen

    Health and Safety News

    Worker seriously injured in culvert collapse

    By Jonathan Brown on February 10, 2016

    Worker seriously injured in culvert collapse

    Two companies have been fined £160,000 after a structure that allows water to flow under roads collapsed on a worker causing serious injury.

    The old, damaged, brick culvert under Tudeley Lane in Tonbridge trapped Michael Skitt, 63, when it fell in January 2012.

    Both Enterprise (AOL) Ltd and Topbond PLC failed to adequately assess the stability of the structure and carry out sufficient planning to ensure adequate control measures were in place, despite been warned of the potential of collapse by the original designers and engineers.

    Duty of care

    Kent County Council appointed Enterprise to replace the culvert. It in turn appointed Topbond to do the majority of the work.

    Culverts are embedded structures, usually surround by soil and can be made from steel, brick or reinforced concrete or other material. They are used to transport water underground from one side of a road or railway to another.

    While the repair and replacement of culverts is a relatively unusual construction job, the collapse of excavations and structures is common knowledge.

    The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) says the companies failed in their duty of care to protect their workers while carrying out the job.

    Its investigation found the old culvert was meant to be totally demolished early on in the work. When the plan changed, the implications of uncovering half of the damaged culvert, and therefore loading it unevenly and undermining it, were not properly managed.

    Multiple injuries

    Mr Skitt and two other workers had entered the area between two culverts in order to clear a channel for the remaining water to flow toward the pump head.

    They had begun to clear loose material but had not started digging when the old culvert collapsed. One man jumped clear, while another was hit but managed to release himself.

    But Mr Skitt was not so lucky. He suffered multiple injuries including shoulder blade breaks, an open shin break and a dislocated knee.

    The 63-year-old spent a total of 26 days in hospital following the accident at work. He has had to give up full-time work and now walks with a stick.

    Enterprise (AOL) Ltd pleading guilty to breaching section 22 (1) and 28 (1) of the Construction (Design & Management) Regulations 2007. It was fined a total of £90,000 and ordered to pay costs of £22,876. Topbond PLC admitted breaches of section 13 (1) and 28 (1) of the same regulations. It was fined £70,000 and ordered to pay costs of £22,876.60.

    Source: Health and Safety Executive

    Share On

       

    Date Published: February 10, 2016

    Author: Jonathan Brown

    Accident Advice Helpline (or AAH) is a trading style of Slater Gordon Solutions Legal Limited. Slater Gordon Solutions Legal Limited is a company registered in England and Wales with registration number 07931918, VAT 142 8192 16, registered office Dempster Building, Atlantic Way, Brunswick Business Park, Liverpool, L3 4UU and is an approved Alternative Business Structure authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

    Disclaimer: This website contains content contributed by third parties, therefore any opinions, comments or other information expressed on this site that do not relate to the business of AAHDL or its associated companies should be understood as neither being held or endorsed by this business.

    No-Win No-Fee: *Subject to insurance costs. Fee payable if case not pursued at client's request.