How much could you claim?

Find out in 30 seconds...
Injured in the last 3 years?
Was the accident your fault?
Did you recieve medical attention?
Please tell us where you were injured
  • Please enter your full name
  • Please enter a valid name
  • Please enter your telephone number
  • Please enter a valid telephone number
  • Please read our Terms & Conditions

    "If you've been injured through no fault of your own you could be entitled to compensation. If you're unsure if you could claim, I recommend you call Accident Advice Helpline."

    Esther Rantzen

    Health and Safety News

    Rally driver killed at 110mph trying to emulate father

    By Jonathan Brown on February 12, 2017

    Rally driver killed at 110mph trying to emulate father

    A young rally driver who was killed while driving at speed wanted to “follow in his dad’s footsteps”, an inquest was told.

    Timothy Cathcart, 20, was driving at around 110mph when his vehicle crashed during the Todds Leap Ulster Rally in August 2014.

    He was pronounced dead at the scene after sustaining fatal head injuries in the collision.

    The 20-year-old student lost control of his modified DS3 Citroen, which consequently crashed, just metres from the finish line. The inquest heard that Mr Cathcart was trying to be like his dad, Ian Cathcart, who was also a rally driver.

    Mr Cathcart crashed into several trees and two fences, one of which divided the narrow country track from a private property.

    David Nicholson, a forensic scientist who investigated the crash, said there would have only been around 1.9 seconds from the moment Mr Cathcart lost control of his car on the crest to the point he collided with the first fence.

    In his opinion, the young driver had “done everything possible” to prevent the collision and “it would have been very difficult to regain vehicle control,” he told the court.

    Co-driver Dai Roberts survived the crash in Fivemiletown, Co Fermanagh, although did sustain serious head injuries.

    Miraculous escape

    During the inquest into Mr Cathcart’s death, coroner Patrick McGurgan said Mr Roberts had been lucky to survive.

    Referring to the fence post that caused Mr Cathcart’s injuries but narrowly missed Mr Roberts, the coroner said it is “almost miraculous that the co-driver got out of the car”.

    Mr McGurgan made a suggestion in court that rally drivers should accompany race organisers in a walk along the route prior to racing, to highlight any visibility issues or difficult turns.

    ‘Acceptable hazards’

    The technical director of the RAC Motorsports Association believes drivers involved in these types of races should accept the dangers of rallying.

    Speaking at the inquest, John Symes – who has since retired – said the “ethos of rallying is very much, ‘take it as it is'”.

    “There are hazards accepted by the rallying community. There are telegraph poles, fences, trees, all manner of things, but they are accepted as part of rallying,” he said.

    “It’s the accumulation of lots of different issues. If you hit anything it’s a hazard. This fence was no more a hazard than anything else along this country road. It is seen as an acceptable hazard in the rallying fraternity.”

    Source: The Belfast Telegraph

    Share On


    Date Published: February 12, 2017

    Author: Jonathan Brown

    Accident Advice Helpline (or AAH) is a trading style of Slater Gordon Solutions Legal Limited. Slater Gordon Solutions Legal Limited is a company registered in England and Wales with registration number 07931918, VAT 142 8192 16, registered office Dempster Building, Atlantic Way, Brunswick Business Park, Liverpool, L3 4UU and is an approved Alternative Business Structure authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

    Disclaimer: This website contains content contributed by third parties, therefore any opinions, comments or other information expressed on this site that do not relate to the business of AAHDL or its associated companies should be understood as neither being held or endorsed by this business.

    No-Win No-Fee: *Subject to insurance costs. Fee payable if case not pursued at client's request.