How much could you claim?

Find out in 30 seconds...
Injured in the last 3 years?
Was the accident your fault?
Did you recieve medical attention?
Please tell us where you were injured
  • Please enter your full name
  • Please enter a valid name
  • Please enter your telephone number
  • Please enter a valid telephone number
  • Please read our Terms & Conditions

    "If you've been injured through no fault of your own you could be entitled to compensation. If you're unsure if you could claim, I recommend you call Accident Advice Helpline."

    Esther Rantzen

    Health and Safety News

    Man loses thumb in work accident

    By David Brown on September 19, 2014

    Man loses thumb in work accident

    Magistrates in Chesterfield have fined a company owner £6,000 after an employee had to have his thumb replaced with a toe following a work accident.

    David Helley, 56, from Tuxford in Nottinghamshire, was also ordered to pay £1,514 in costs after pleading guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.

    He is the owner of a Derbyshire-based company that refurbishes precision machining equipment.

    The incident happened on the premises of CNC Rotary in Staveley on June 17 last year when Mark Evans, 45, was working on a rotary table device.

    Severed completely

    Mr Evans, from Chesterfield, was about to rebuild the tool when it suddenly became detached from a sling which attached the device to the prongs of a forklift truck used to lift it.

    His hand became trapped, which led to his right thumb being severed completely and caused serious tendon damage to the hand.

    Doctors used one of Mr Evans’ big toes to replace the thumb and gave him a skin graft for the damaged area on his right hand.

    However, magistrates were told that he suffered “debilitating complications”, which meant that he was unable to return to work for 12 months.

    Serious safety flaws

    The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) launched an investigation into the incident and identified a number of safety failings.

    It was found that an attachment to secure the sling to the truck was missing, and that managers failed to thoroughly check the sling and the device’s eyebolts.

    HSE inspectors issued Prohibition Notices which meant untested lifting bolts and eyes were no longer allowed. They also banned the spraying of solvent-based paint in areas where they found unprotected electrics, and the use of paint products containing lead chromate and isocyanate.

    Improvement Notices were served which require the company to re-think its training on lifting and slinging, as well as its examination scheme for two pressure vessels.

    HSE inspector Steve Shaw said after the hearing that Mr Evans’ “life-changing injury” could have been prevented if better safety measures had been in place.

    Making a claim

    If you have been injured in similar accident at work you may be eligible for personal injury compensation.

    Accident Advice Helpline has been helping people like you win compensation claims for personal injuries for more than a decade now.

    You can call us at any time on one of our freephone numbers: 0800 689 0500 for landline calls and 0333 500 0993 for mobiles.

    Source: BBC 

    Share On

       

    Date Published: September 19, 2014

    Author: David Brown

    Accident Advice Helpline (or AAH) is a trading style of Slater Gordon Solutions Legal Limited. Slater Gordon Solutions Legal Limited is a company registered in England and Wales with registration number 07931918, VAT 142 8192 16, registered office Dempster Building, Atlantic Way, Brunswick Business Park, Liverpool, L3 4UU and is an approved Alternative Business Structure authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

    Disclaimer: This website contains content contributed by third parties, therefore any opinions, comments or other information expressed on this site that do not relate to the business of AAHDL or its associated companies should be understood as neither being held or endorsed by this business.

    No-Win No-Fee: *Subject to insurance costs. Fee payable if case not pursued at client's request.