How much could you claim?

Find out in 30 seconds...
Injured in the last 3 years?
Was the accident your fault?
Did you receive medical attention?
Please tell us where you were injured
  • Please enter your full name
  • Please enter a valid name
  • Please enter your telephone number
  • Please enter a valid telephone number
  • Please read our Terms & Conditions

    "If you've been injured through no fault of your own you could be entitled to compensation. If you're unsure if you could claim, I recommend you call Accident Advice Helpline."

    Esther Rantzen

    Health and Safety News

    Lorry driver crushed in tail lift accident

    By Carly Robins on April 8, 2015

    Lorry driver crushed in tail lift accident

    A routine unloading operation led to tragedy in Dudley, when a worker was crushed in a horrific tail lift accident. It is believed that the driver, Gary Pickering, had been trying to lower the lift while he was busy removing items from the back of his lorry.

    The likeliest theory was that he had inadvertently pressed the machine’s ‘up’ button during this manoeuvring, which had caused the lift to jolt suddenly, crushing him between the lift and the vehicle. The transport manager claimed that he had been unaware of this risk.

    During an inquest, the manager, Alan Beech, explained that the manufacturers of the lift, T J Morris, had failed to warn about the potential danger from the equipment. In addition, the health and safety manager working for the firm, Home Bargains, did not inspect any of the tail lifts when they were first installed.

    He gave the reason that he had mistakenly assumed they were like-for-like replacements for the tail lifts that the delivery drivers had been using for some time. Had he known the machinery could shut in this way, the 34 year-old driver could have been forewarned.

    How could the tail lift accident have been prevented?

    Every workplace in the UK is governed by stringent health and safety regulations. One of the key aspects of this legislation is risk assessment. In this particular case, there should have been no doubt whatsoever about the capability of the tail lifts for causing this type of injury.

    The fact that the lifts were new to the premises should have been no excuse for the risk assessment not having been undertaken. In fact, new equipment being rolled out to any workplace should be prioritised. All employees should be fully trained in every aspect of the operation, and familiarity should never be assumed.

    Can anyone help after an industrial injury?

    Yes, and Accident Advice Helpline have been providing no-obligation advice to anyone who has suffered through someone else’s negligence for over 14 years.

    If you telephone our free contact number – 0800 689 0500 – we will ensure your details are handed over to someone from our team of professional compensation claims solicitors.

    They are expert in every aspect of compensation claims procedures, and can assess your own circumstances to see if you would qualify for a no win, no fee* claim. You can also visit our website and try out our 30-second claim calculator.

    Source: Manchester Evening News 

    Share On

       

    Accident Advice Helpline (or AAH) is a trading style of Slater Gordon Solutions Legal Limited. Slater Gordon Solutions Legal Limited is a company registered in England and Wales with registration number 07931918, VAT 142 8192 16, registered office Dempster Building, Atlantic Way, Brunswick Business Park, Liverpool, L3 4UU and is an approved Alternative Business Structure authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

    Disclaimer: This website contains content contributed by third parties, therefore any opinions, comments or other information expressed on this site that do not relate to the business of AAHDL or its associated companies should be understood as neither being held or endorsed by this business.

    No-Win No-Fee: *Subject to insurance costs. Fee payable if case not pursued at client's request.