How much could you claim?

Find out in 30 seconds...
Injured in the last 3 years?
Was the accident your fault?
Did you recieve medical attention?
Please tell us where you were injured
  • Please enter your full name
  • Please enter a valid name
  • Please enter your telephone number
  • Please enter a valid telephone number
  • Please read our Terms & Conditions

    "If you've been injured through no fault of your own you could be entitled to compensation. If you're unsure if you could claim, I recommend you call Accident Advice Helpline."

    Esther Rantzen

    Health and Safety News

    Chocolate factory worker lost thumb

    By David Brown on January 9, 2015

    Chocolate factory worker lost thumb

    A worker at a chocolate factory lost her thumb after getting it trapped in an unguarded machine that she was cleaning by herself for the first time, a court heard.

    Pecan Candy Deluxe (Europe) Ltd, of Moor Lane Trading Estate, Sherburn-in-Elmet, Leeds, was fined £7,000 with £627 costs after pleading guilty to breaching the Health and Safety at Work Act.

    It was prosecuted by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) for failing to guard the machine’s dangerous moving parts properly.

    Worker was not fully trained

    Leeds Magistrates’ Court heard that Maria Pirie was cleaning a stirring machine when the accident at work happened in January 2013.

    Ms Pirie, of Sherburn-in-Elmet, the court heard, was not fully trained and was cleaning the equipment on her own for the first time. Her left thumb was sliced off when it got trapped between the moving stirrer and the side of the vessel.

    Following the accident the left-handed 46-year-old underwent surgery to reattach her thumb but the court heard it would never function as it did before. Magistrates were told she has trouble performing everyday tasks and has had to relearn how to write.

    The HSE told the court that a simple interlocked guard would have prevented the accident. Following the incident the firm fitted such a guard to the machine.

    The court heard that following a visit by an inspector in January 2012 – 12 months before the accident – the HSE had served the chocolate and fudge manufacturing firm with an Improvement Notice regarding guards on mixing machines.

    Accident ‘easily preventable’

    Following the court case, Rachel Brittain, an HSE inspector, said the accident could and should have been prevented.

    She said Ms Pirie had suffered a painful, lasting injury as a result of the firm failing to provide the guarding which would have stopped workers getting too close to the stirring machine’s dangerous moving parts.

    The inspector said the company had been served a notice on guarding before the accident but had not made the improvements required.

    She said in the food and drink industry unguarded machines result in too many deaths and injuries, adding that workers should be supervised and well trained.

    Contact Accident Advice Helpline on 0800 689 0500 or 0333 500 0993 from a mobile phone if you have been injured in an accident at work that wasn’t your fault.

    Our team of expert lawyers will quickly be able to decide if you are eligible to make a claim for compensation.

    Source: The Health & Safety Executive 

    Share On

       

    Date Published: January 9, 2015

    Author: David Brown

    Accident Advice Helpline (or AAH) is a trading style of Slater Gordon Solutions Legal Limited. Slater Gordon Solutions Legal Limited is a company registered in England and Wales with registration number 07931918, VAT 142 8192 16, registered office Dempster Building, Atlantic Way, Brunswick Business Park, Liverpool, L3 4UU and is an approved Alternative Business Structure authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

    Disclaimer: This website contains content contributed by third parties, therefore any opinions, comments or other information expressed on this site that do not relate to the business of AAHDL or its associated companies should be understood as neither being held or endorsed by this business.

    No-Win No-Fee: *Subject to insurance costs. Fee payable if case not pursued at client's request.